Surely her resignation would spur the MG to action, especially in light of their pretty dismal track record in dealing with accusations of abuse. Nope. Instead, a past-AD spoke in favor of this leader saying that not every state considers clergy mandatory reporters. Let's take a moment here to appreciate the word "clergy."
Two weeks passed before the MG issued a statement informing the membership of the resignation and assuring everyone that that they were taking a hard look at the policies.
Yet, this accused priest/leader remains in their position. Why?
The abuse happened a long time ago (the then minor victim is now an adult). The authorities were unable to prosecute. So, the MG feels no obligation to do anything further either. They are content to let this person remain in a position of authority, influence, and respect within the church. The ArchDruid refuses to act, not even to encourage this priest/leader to quietly resign their position.
Because ADF leadership is fine with boys being boys.